Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Summer Reading List


Seawolf Debate
Summer Reading List


Must-reads

Gross, Michael L. Moral Dilemmas of Modern War: Torture, Assassination, and Blackmail in an Age of Asymmetric Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010.

Sandel, Michael J. Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.

Zakaria, Fareed. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2003.



More Reading

George, Robert P. The Clash of Orthodoxies: Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis. Wilmington, DE: ISI, 2001.

Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. [New York]: Basic, 1992.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Annotated Motions Working Groups

Annotated Motions Working Groups

Group A

Group B

Group C

Amie Stanley

Amy Parrent

Andrew Kerosky

Brett Frazer

Brittany Bennett

Drew Cason

Hannah Foreman

Emily Barker

Jon Stinson

Libby Smelker

Kelsey Waldorf

Kenneth Moss

Matt Ostrander

Matt Fox

Matt Stinson

Zac Johnson

Mya Dale

Nathanael Jenkins

Wiley Cason

Nye Smith

Sarah Carpenter



Nicole Eldred

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Give thanks for research!

Below are notes from last night's discussion of briefs/motions for the remainder of the semester:

Annotated Motions

For Friday, Nov. 18, all debaters not traveling to CUSID BP this weekend should bring two motions that they would set if they were CAs at a tournament this weekend. Shawn will lead collection/discussion/refinement of those on Friday morning and leave the list for me.

On Monday, when I return, I'll create a new annotated motions document and open it to all of you to claim your motions. You should then find at least one analytic, pro and con article for the one or two motions for which you're responsible. You should complete this before Sunday, Nov. 27.

Examples of motions and articles in the annotated motions format may be found in the "Readings" section of seawolfdebate.info.


Philippines / South East Asia research

The senior debaters will be responsible for developing brief topics related to motions they anticipate may be used at worlds in the traditional national/regional round. Those topics are due to me by Sunday, Nov. 27.

I'll refine that list and pass it along to Shawn for brief assignments to be distributed on Tuesday, Nov. 29. All those not going to Australia should take responsibility for one of those brief topics. Those briefs are due on Dec. 13.


Remember that there is no practice on either Tuesday (11/22) or Friday (11/25) of the holiday week. Have a happy Thanksgiving and best of luck to all of us at our final tournaments before Worlds!

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Hart House motions, maybe . . .

If I were the CA at Hart House, I'd write a motion like . . .

  1. THW occupy Wall Street.
  2. THW sanction China for manipulating its currency.
  3. THW stop the use and development of nuclear power.
  4. THW require fingerprinting with applications for social services.
  5. THW place sanctions on nations that participate in prisoner swaps with terrorist nations.
  6. THB immigration is harming EU stability.
  7. THW ban the opening carrying of handguns.
  8. THW cut all ties to Pakistan.
  9. THW substantially increase aid to the Africa Union.
  10. THW abolish credit ratings for sovereign debt.
  11. THW support unionization in developing nations.
  12. The West should curb its efforts to promote democracy.
  13. THW support Turkey's membership in the EU.
  14. THS the Eurasian Union.
  15. THW end immunity for US soldiers in Iraq.
  16. THW give the EU central bank complete fiscal control of all countries in the Eurozone until the EU submits a plan to deal with sovereign debt issues.
  17. THB an international organization should regulate the sale of credit default swaps.
  18. THW abolish the targeted killing of civilians.
  19. TH regrets the Arab Spring.
  20. THB that Egypt should lift the state of emergency before the elections.
  21. THW . . . Egypt . . . Coptic Christian Church.
  22. THW implement the Buffet rule.
  23. The US should reinstate aid to Palestine.
  24. THW reject the expansion of the Euro bailout fund.
  25. THW believe Serbian Kosovars to have the right of secession.
  26. THS inquiring of students' parents' immigration status in public schools.
  27. THS a divided Afghanistan.

Friday, October 7, 2011

Debate on Tuesday, Oct 11

The Reading: America’s drone campaign: Drones and the law

The motion:
The US was justified in its use of drones to Anwar al-Awlaki.

The pairings:

Squadroom

OG: Drew & Colin OO: Brett & Amy

CG: Brittany & Wiley CO: Sarah & Amie


ADM 148

OG: Matt O. & Jon OO: Matt F. & Kelsey

CG: Matt S. & Megan CO: Hannah & Libby

Friday, September 23, 2011

Practice for Tuesday, Sept 27

We'll begin the debate as close to 5:30 as possible. Please remember that because I'm releasing the motion now, you won't have any prep time before the round begins.

The Motion: The US should support Palestine's bid for
UN recognition as a sovereign state.

Round 1: Squadroom

OG:
Wiley & Brittany
OO: Amie & Sarah
CG: Megan & Matt S.
CO: Nye & Hannah

Round 2: ADM 283

OG:
Drew & Colin
OO: Andrew & Matthieu
CG: Kelsey & Matt F.
CO: Jon & Libby

Friday, September 9, 2011

Retreat Schedule

Seawolf Debate 2011 Early Season Retreat

Friday, Sept 16

9:30 – 11:30 Lecture: Speakers & Speeches (JV Competitors)
9:30 – 11:30 Round 1 (Varsity Competitors)
11:30 – 1:30 Round 2
1:30 – 2:30 Lunch
2:30 – 3:30 Lecture: Stasis & Structure
3:30 – 5:30 Round 3
5:30 – 7:30 Round 4

Saturday, Sept 17

9:30 – 10:30 Lecture: Making Practical Arguments
10:30 – 12:30 Round 5
12:30 – 1:30 Lunch
1:30 – 2:30 Lecture: Making Principled Arguments
2:30 – 4:30 Round 6
4:30 – 6:30 Round 7

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Expositional Brief Topics

Let me say first that I am very impressed with what you produced. I think there are many more potential topics that exist for our first effort at these briefs (indeed, I have over 30 on my list that I liked) but I've done my best to prioritize these based on what I perceive to be their utility and relevance.


The topics are listed roughly in priority order, though it may be more accurate to say that I like the first 7 a bit better than the second 7. That said, any of these are available for you to select as the subject of your first effort at this. I'll take topic selections generally on a first-come, first-served basis, but you may want to note if a particular topic was your suggestion and if you have insight/interest that would be worth preferencing. I'll update this blog post as necessary to identify who has selected which topics. Please provide me with three topic selections listed in your order of preference.


A reminder about the guidelines for these briefs: remember that you're not only preparing a brief, but a symposium on your topic. You should prepare an outline of your topic (4 pages--let me know if you need more) and some experiential approach to familiarizing us with the topic (a debate, an exercise, etc.). The topic will be the focus of an entire night's practice, so you should be prepared to assist your teammates with thoroughly immersing themselves in the subject matter. Particularly useful will be any effort to identify broadly applicable/useful/relevant principles, standards or approaches that derive from your topic.


Remember that first drafts are due by August 10 and final briefs are to be completed by August 26. I'll be happy to look at earlier efforts; I'm back in the office after July 5 so you'll get a more rapid response after that.



--------------------------------------------------


1. Property Rights - COLIN HAUGHEY


A look at the foundations of individual autonomy. Focus should be on what constitutes “property,” the grounds on which the state may appropriate property and a consideration of both the libertarian justification of individual ownership/control of property as well as an examination of the major countervailing theories of property (ie: socialism).


THW tax intellectual property.

THW legalize the sale of human organs.

THW legalize prostitution.

THW tolerate consensual cannibalism.

THW allow individuals to sell their votes.


2. Religion and the State - DREW CASON


This is a consideration of the appropriate and extant roles of the state with regard to religion. Most are familiar with the Jeffersonian “wall of separation,” but when does the state have the right to intervene in religious affairs? How do other WLDs accommodate religion? Can a theocracy tolerate other religions?


THW tax churches that make a profit.

THBT children should be excluded from all religion until adulthood.

THBT the state should cease to recognize the specific right to religious freedom.

THB the criminal justice system should use only secular rehabilitation programs.

THW distribute developmental aid through religious organizations rather than the state.

THW ban all religious involvement in schools.

THW compel priests to divulge the details of confessionals in criminal trials.

THBT governments of liberal democracies should vociferously condemn states that ban the burqa.

TH opposes organized religion.

THW require organized religions to pay reparations to women for facilitating their oppression.

THBT the government should forcibly remove women and children from extremist religious communities.


3. Postmortem rights - AMIE STANLEY


Making the case for individual rights is relatively easy when your subject is alive, but what about an individual’s rights after death? Here you may consider the law as it protects those rights expressed (ie: wills, probate, etc.) but also how the law deals with situations where the deceased’s intentions are not made clear.


THW make the post-mortem donation of organs compulsory without exception.

THBT courts should not enforce wills that discriminate on the basis of race.

THW prohibit the conception of children using the genetic material of someone who has died.


4. Stewardship, custody, duty of care


In what cases does the state bear a responsibility to act on another’s behalf? What standards exist for making such a determination? What about when another’s claims to care conflict with the state’s?


THW grant the state the exclusive right to make decisions on behalf of the mentally ill.

THW prosecute parents who take their children to another legal jurisdiction in order to carry out an act which is illegal in their home country.

THBT senior citizens should be financially supported (when required) by their adult children.


5. Procedural Justice/Due Process - WILEY CASON


A distinction is often made between just means and just outcomes. In the context of the legal system—particularly criminal justice—the means often are prioritized above the ends. How do we balance procedural justice with seeking just outcomes? What protections for procedural justice exist? When may the concern for procedural justice be set aside?


THW allow the use of entrapment.

THW ban the use of evidence acquired from countries who practice torture.

THW allow the use of racial profiling by police forces.

THW allow the use of aggressive entrapment techniques to identify and foil potential terrorists.

THBT the state should prosecute cases of sexual assault even without the victim’s consent.

THW condition all plea bargains to the victim’s consent.

THW instruct jurors to acquit where they believe conviction not to be in the pubic interest.

THW compel priests to divulge the details of confessionals in criminal trials.


6. Paternalism - AMIE STANLEY


Libertarians believe that paternalism has no place in government. Others believe that a government bears a responsibility to protect individuals from themselves. What does liberty mean in the context of a concern for the value and sanctity of human life? Beyond the “swing your fist” argument, by what standards should we determine if paternalistic goals are appropriate in legislation?


THW use the educational system to establish norms in children beyond mere obedience to the law.

THW require schools to teach safe sex education from age 10 regardless of parental consent.

THW allow companies to refuse to hire smokers.

THW pay morbidly obese people to lose weight.

THW not allow fast food companies to give away toys with unhealthy meals.

THW remove all sin taxes.


7. Human Rights - SARAH CARPENTER


Often we refer to human rights as a warrant for state action. Other times, we’re called upon to consider expanding those things that we already recognize as human rights. A more clear understanding of these rights would be useful. What are “human rights?” From where do they emanate? What are examples of where human rights have been codified? What are the “three generations of human rights?”


THW recognize a human right to a basic standard of living.

THB that access to the internet should be a human right.

THB that housing should be a fundamental human right.


8. Reproductive/Parental Rights - AMY PARRENT


Do individuals have a “right” to be parents? If so, must the state provide that opportunity for individuals (ie: is it a positive right?) or must the state merely not prevent individuals from procreating (ie: negative rights). How do the rights of an individual (or individuals) to parent interact with the obligation of the state to protect the vulnerable (ie: the potential child)?


THW refuse artificial insemination to single women.

TH supports the selection of human embryos on the basis of any advantageous genetic characteristics.

THB that adoption agencies that receive state funding should give priority to same sex couples and infertile couples.

TH prefers that children of racial minorities be adopted by parents of that race.

THBT in the case that the biological parents decide to terminate a pregnancy, the surrogate mother should assume responsibility/final choice for the child’s future.


9. Poverty/Wealth Disparity - BRETT FRAZER


How is wealth distributed throughout the world? Which are the most equal societies and why? What undesirable outcomes does poverty produce? Is there such a thing as a “cycle” of poverty, or can individuals pull themselves up by their bootstraps? What causes poverty and what successfully alleviates it?


THW require people to work in return for welfare payments.

THW reduce welfare payments to parents whose children break the law.

THW make fines relative to wealth.

THW give more votes to the poor.


10. Children's Culpability & Autonomy - SARAH CARPENTER


We have considered the age of majority in previous briefs; the focus of this brief should be on the degree to which we expect children to look after their own interests. Are there developmental markers that allow us to determine when an individual becomes responsible for his or her own actions? Can we assign culpability in degrees based on age? What right do children have to be left alone? How do we let children assert this right?


THBT fear should not be used as a means of propagating religion to children.

THW grant birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants.

THW try juveniles accused of particularly heinous crimes as adults.

THW not force children to sing the national anthem in schools.

THBT children should be excluded from any religion until adulthood.

THW punish parents for their children’s crimes.


11. State & Sports


This brief can’t hope to inform individuals about the fundamentals of every sport to identify common characteristics of what constitutes sport. That said, a brief about the value of sport to a society (ie: is sport a public good?) and the role of the state in managing sport would be useful. This brief should consider both public/national teams (ie: Olympic athletics) and private (ie: professional leagues) conceptions of sport.


THW implement quotas for domestic players in national football leagues.

THBT national sports teams should reflect the diversity of the national population.

THW prosecute players who commit flagrant fouls for assault.

THW give equal rights to the football legionnaires in the EU.

THW impose a salary cap for the players of professional sports teams.


12. Nationalism - DREW CASON


Political collectives are defined by adherence to a common ideology. When does a state have the right to protect that common ideology and what costs will be tolerated in that effort? What is the relationship between culture and the state? To what degree (and under what conditions) does self-interest trump obligations to assist others?


THBT states should actively support the practice of homegrown religion.

THBT governments should block the foreign takeover of important companies.

THB that governments should not fund art forms of foreign origin.

THW implement quotas for domestic players in national football leagues.

THBT EU member states should allow for domestic referendums on all constitutional changes to the EU. (2008 Australian)

THBT developed countries should not accept skilled migrants from developing countries.

TH supports state initiatives to define a national cultural identity.


13. Affirmative Action - BRETT FRAZER


What obligation does a state have to address inequity in society? What are the various grounds on which a state justifies acting to provide preference to a particular group? How does equality of opportunity differ from equality of outcomes? Are there examples of successful efforts at affirmative action? Unsuccessful?


THW allow the defendants that belong to a minority group to choose to be judged by a jury composed exclusively of other members of their same minority.

THW set quotas for female representatives on national legislatures.

THW mandate a quota for women on the boards of large corporations.


14. Medical Autonomy - AMY PARRENT


To what degree should individuals be allowed to make their own choices when seeking medical treatment? How does the state’s duty of care and the medical profession’s imperative to “do no harm” reconcile with this autonomy? Are there clear ethical frameworks that assist us to make these difficult choices?


THW remove the right to refuse medically-necessary treatment.

THW grant the mentally ill and their families the right to refuse medical treatment.

THW make cosmetic surgery illegal.

TH favors compulsory HIV testing.

Friday, March 26, 2010

The rest of the year

Some important events for your calendars for the remainder of the semester:

April 5 - College of Fellows Debate (Means vs. Merit on financial aid); 6:00 pm
April 8-12 - US Universities Championships in Denver
April 16 & 17 - Northern Lights Invitational
April 21 - Commonwealth North Debate - 12:00
April 30, 9:00 am - Mirror Lake middle school debate
May 2 - Commencement

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Brief Assignments

Thanks to those of you who submitted brief topics and shame on those of you who didn't (Colin, Drew, James, Sarah, Kelcie, Amie, Brett and Christy). Those who couldn't be bothered to suggest topics will be the first to have briefs due.

I've mapped our due dates for the remainder of the season. Many do not yet have topics assigned; I'm waiting to see what issues will be hot as nationals approaches. If people requested particular topics I've tried to honor that.

Assignments for the first round (the date identified is the date on which the briefs are due):

Friday, March 5
Colin: Military courts or civilian courts for terror suspects?
Drew: The Tea Party: do they have legitimate interests and legitimate prospects at gaining power?
James
: Homophobia in Africa: the policies being initiated and how the world should/can react.
Sarah: Governing Iran: Who are the players? What is the status of the Opposition? Is the Revolutionary Guard going to take over? How can we respond?

Tuesday, March 16

Amie: The Chinese yuan: should it float? How do we pressure China to revalue their currency?
Brett: Yemen: the next Somolia? How can we address instability there?
Christy: Muslims in Europe.

Friday, March 19
Kelsey: Banning the portrayal of unhealthy body types: see Spain's recent action.
Amy
: Education reform: what of Central Falls, Rhode Island's firing of the faculty and staff of a failing elementary school and Obama's School Improvement Grants? I imagine a motion having to do with radical solutions for failed schools.
Wiley: Repeal Don't Ask/Don't Tell? I'm particularly interested in the CON side of this pro/con brief.
Jonathon: Nigeria country brief, focusing on the recent coup and this weekend's slaughter. Is it time for the international community to intervene?
Faith: The coming water wars: how will it happen and what must we do to prevent it?

Tuesday, March 23



Friday March 26
Akis: The Greek debt crisis and the EU's response.
Zac: Google and China: who wins, who loses? Is there a role for the US in this dispute
Michaela
: Mexico, the next failed state?
Colin: How to reduce the deficit. You should build on Brett's brief from last semester to more thoroughly investigate the options available to us for reducing our deficit.
Drew: Should the state subsidize green jobs/development?
Sarah: The US should create a consumer financial protection agency.

Tuesday, March 30
Kelsey: Can we require people to purchase health insurance?
Amie: Pakistan's desire for an India-style nuclear deal with the US.
Brett: The obesity brief: what is the status quo in the US with regard to the rate of obesity and the costs of that obesity? What policy changes have proved / might prove effective at combating obesity?
Christy: A primer on international trade.

Friday, April 2
Amy: How to stop Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem (yes, Brett, you did a brief on settlements but this brief is about the E. J. settlements in particular)
Wiley: Sanctions and Iran--what sanctions are in place? Have they been effective? What sanctions are proposed? Will they be successful?
Jonathon: Should the international community call for the current Thai government to step down?
Faith: Iraq: status quo post elections.

Tuesday, April 6
Michaela: The Pope's sex scandal--should he step down?
Akis: Pro/Con on Obama's off-shore drilling proposal.
Zac: Should we be able to patent genes?
Mya: Should Israel launch a preemptive attack on Iran's nuclear facilities?

April 8-11 US Universities Debating Championships in Denver

Monday, February 15, 2010

Brief Topics

As discussed in Friday's practice, I'm going to make brief topic assignments based on suggestions submitted through the comments section below. Please record your brief topics here by Tuesday night; I'll make assignments by Friday.

Video review for ethos

Below are the videos from Friday's (2/12) practice round. Remember, the point of putting these videos up is to allow you the opportunity to review what you're doing that may affect the audience's perceptions of your ethos. You should watch the videos, both for what you do while you're speaking as well as for what you're doing while others are speaking (including your partner and your opposition).

The videos are of the same round; one focuses on the Prop side and the other the Opp side.

Prop from Steve Johnson on Vimeo.



Opp from Steve Johnson on Vimeo.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Ethos and Debating

Next Friday (2/12) we're going to begin talking about ethos and debating. I want all of you to watch this video of last Friday's practice round as a way to begin that discussion.

In particular, you should try to identify examples of behaviors that compromise your credibility as a speaker. Review your speech (or the speeches of others) and identify those instance by the time the occur in the video. We'll watch selections from this round during our discussion on Friday.

Horrors of War - Feb 5 from Steve Johnson on Vimeo.

Friday, February 5, 2010

Club Council Schedule

Here are dates and obligations for Club Council. Names are listed in Primary/Backup order. If you're the primary attendee and you can't make it, please let your backup know.

You're expected to report on the meeting you attend.

Jan 15: Akis
Jan 29: Amy/Akis
Feb 12: Brett/Amy
Feb 26: Colin/Brett
Mar 5: Sarah/Colin
Mar 19: Zac/Sarah
Apr 2: Wiley/Zac
Apr 10: Faith/Amy

Friday, January 22, 2010

Declamation Exercise for Friday, 1/29

Here's the video I'd like each of you to watch in preparation for next week's declamation exercise. Some tips:

  1. Check the assignments below to know what your role in the debate will be.
  2. Take your role seriously. If you're speaking, you should flow the round meticulously, watch it several times and attempt to capture both the substance and expression of the arguments.
  3. Following the round, the adjudication panel will engage in a (fly-on-the-wall) deliberation to rank the teams. Obviously there is no video of the actual deliberation that occurred, but we do know the outcome. I'm not going to hold the adjudication panel to that outcome; they may judge the round that happened. Following their deliberation, we'll discuss the exercise.
  4. Be ready to go at 9:30 next Friday.

PM: Akis
LO: Amy
DPM: Brett
DLO: Sarah
MP: Jonathon
MO: Colin
PW: Wiley
OW: Drew

Chair: James
Panelists: Michael, Christy, Faith, Mila & Mya


Debate - WUDC - Finals 2010 Turkey - Media Should Show Horrors of War from Alfred Snider on Vimeo.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Cabin Fever Recruitment

Recruitment for the 2010 Cabin Fever Debates is much slower than I would like. At present, we have only 14 teams registered, though we do seem to be attracting many more individuals this year than in years past.

It's time for you to make an extraordinary personal effort to increase our registration.

By Sunday, January 25th, I want each of you to post a comment to this blog that identifies 2 teams you personally recruited. If each of you recruits 2 teams, we'll easily meet our goal of 36 teams.

The following people are those regularly traveling with the competitive team and/or those who have received scholarships for this semester. You, particularly, have an obligation to recruit CFD participants:

Faith Caparas
Colin Haughey
James Kilcup
Michael Imeson
Michaela Hernandez
Amy Parrent
Jonathan Sanchez
Amie Stanley
Akis Gialopsos
Sarah Carpenter
Brett Frazer
Mya Dale
Christy Strong
Drew Cason

Let me be clear: at this point in the run-up to the CFDs, it's not enough merely to talk with your friends or classmates about the tournament. To meet my expectations for this assignment, you must produce a complete, registered team that is entered in the tournament. Find your friend a partner. Make them sit down with you and register. Offer to help them at all levels of their participation.

Only when their registration hits Shawn's master spreadsheet of teams entered will your contribution count.

If you are having trouble finding a partner for a potential recruit, you have two options:

1. Ask Shawn for a list of singletons who have already registered to see if you know anybody. If you do, hook them up with your potential recruit.

2. Encourage your potential recruit to post a request for a partner on the CFD Facebook page's Wall. We're trying to direct singletons to use that space to find other individuals seeking partners.

Remember how valuable this tournament is for our team's public relations, for those who benefit from participating and for promoting critical discourse on topics of importance to us all. These outcomes are realized only if we get people involved--and that depends on you.